<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1000 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the re-opening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was based on the same material without new tangible evidence, amounting to a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on the merits of the disallowance, stating that the deduction claimed by the assessee for Octroi payment was allowable for the impugned assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1000 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the re-opening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was based on the same material without new tangible evidence, amounting to a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on the merits of the disallowance, stating that the deduction claimed by the assessee for Octroi payment was allowable for the impugned assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>