<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 998 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for factual verification in cases of staggered payments under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It balanced considerations regarding unverifiable cash expenditure and personal use of vehicles, directing reductions in disallowances for both issues. The order was pronounced on 18.04.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 998 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for factual verification in cases of staggered payments under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It balanced considerations regarding unverifiable cash expenditure and personal use of vehicles, directing reductions in disallowances for both issues. The order was pronounced on 18.04.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>