<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 990 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358879</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of considering genuine reasons for delay in filing appeals. The ITAT highlighted the need to interpret legal provisions liberally to condone delays, balancing technical considerations with substantial justice. The decision set aside the CIT(A) orders and remitted the proceedings for adjudication on merits, emphasizing fair adjudication in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 990 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358879</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of considering genuine reasons for delay in filing appeals. The ITAT highlighted the need to interpret legal provisions liberally to condone delays, balancing technical considerations with substantial justice. The decision set aside the CIT(A) orders and remitted the proceedings for adjudication on merits, emphasizing fair adjudication in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>