<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 970 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for recall of the order, directing the Registry to list the appeal for final disposal under its original number. The application for rectification of mistake was allowed, leading to the modification of the previous final order. The judgment emphasizes the importance of maintaining accurate records and rectifying mistakes promptly to ensure procedural fairness and uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 970 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for recall of the order, directing the Registry to list the appeal for final disposal under its original number. The application for rectification of mistake was allowed, leading to the modification of the previous final order. The judgment emphasizes the importance of maintaining accurate records and rectifying mistakes promptly to ensure procedural fairness and uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>