<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 967 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358856</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on rent-a-cab, courier, mandap keeper and catering services used in connection with business operations because the relevant period preceded the restrictive amendment to the definition of input service. The services were used for employee transport, canteen facilities, company programmes and delivery of goods to buyers, all of which fell within the then wider ambit of activities relating to business. Courier services used to dispatch goods up to the buyer&#039;s premises were also covered for that period. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:55:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 967 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358856</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on rent-a-cab, courier, mandap keeper and catering services used in connection with business operations because the relevant period preceded the restrictive amendment to the definition of input service. The services were used for employee transport, canteen facilities, company programmes and delivery of goods to buyers, all of which fell within the then wider ambit of activities relating to business. Courier services used to dispatch goods up to the buyer&#039;s premises were also covered for that period. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>