<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further verification and analysis regarding availing CENVAT credit on insurance services for Quartz Analog Watches manufacturing. The issue of eligibility of service tax on insurance premium for dependents was raised, emphasizing the need to determine if premiums for dependents were directly related to manufacturing activities. The Tribunal instructed the adjudicating authority to thoroughly examine documents, verify premium payment structure, and consider relevant case laws before making a decision. Consequently, the original order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further verification and analysis regarding availing CENVAT credit on insurance services for Quartz Analog Watches manufacturing. The issue of eligibility of service tax on insurance premium for dependents was raised, emphasizing the need to determine if premiums for dependents were directly related to manufacturing activities. The Tribunal instructed the adjudicating authority to thoroughly examine documents, verify premium payment structure, and consider relevant case laws before making a decision. Consequently, the original order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>