<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 964 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358853</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD partially allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance of Cenvat credit on various grounds. The Tribunal held that certain amounts of Cenvat credit were allowable, including credit related to branches under centralized registration, telephone and mobile bills in employees&#039; names, credit on E-bills/Xerox copies, and bills for essential input services like transportation of diesel. The disallowed amounts for lack of produced documents and improper bills for maintenance and repair were remanded for clarification and re-computation, respectively. The decision considered all submissions and legal provisions, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 964 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358853</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD partially allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance of Cenvat credit on various grounds. The Tribunal held that certain amounts of Cenvat credit were allowable, including credit related to branches under centralized registration, telephone and mobile bills in employees&#039; names, credit on E-bills/Xerox copies, and bills for essential input services like transportation of diesel. The disallowed amounts for lack of produced documents and improper bills for maintenance and repair were remanded for clarification and re-computation, respectively. The decision considered all submissions and legal provisions, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>