https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358844 The Tribunal upheld the demand for an amount equivalent to 6% of the value of exempted goods for the period July 2014 to March 2015 due to the appellant's change in payment option under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, effective only from 01.04.2015. The penalty for turnover discount credit was restricted to 15% of the duty amount paid, penalties for CENVAT credit during merger were set aside as the credit was fully reversed, and the demand for differential duty on incentives received under a government scheme was rejected. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:55:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358844 The Tribunal upheld the demand for an amount equivalent to 6% of the value of exempted goods for the period July 2014 to March 2015 due to the appellant's change in payment option under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, effective only from 01.04.2015. The penalty for turnover discount credit was restricted to 15% of the duty amount paid, penalties for CENVAT credit during merger were set aside as the credit was fully reversed, and the demand for differential duty on incentives received under a government scheme was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358844