https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358837 The tribunal held that the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, was entitled to Cenvat credit for various services including corporate services, professional fees for e-auction, ambulance service, medical treatment, and health check-up of employees. These services were deemed essential for the manufacturing process, making them eligible for Cenvat credit. However, the denial of Cenvat credit for civil works was upheld due to insufficient documentation. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, except for civil works, which were not eligible for credit. Judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2018. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358837 The tribunal held that the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, was entitled to Cenvat credit for various services including corporate services, professional fees for e-auction, ambulance service, medical treatment, and health check-up of employees. These services were deemed essential for the manufacturing process, making them eligible for Cenvat credit. However, the denial of Cenvat credit for civil works was upheld due to insufficient documentation. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, except for civil works, which were not eligible for credit. Judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2018. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358837