https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358834 The final order was recalled to the limited extent necessary because it contained no finding on the appellant's challenge to the personal penalty. That omission was treated as an error requiring correction, as the connected appeal had been disposed of commonly without determining whether the penalty was upheld or set aside. The rectification application was therefore allowed to that extent, and the appeal was restored for fresh disposal on the penalty issue. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:54:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358834 The final order was recalled to the limited extent necessary because it contained no finding on the appellant's challenge to the personal penalty. That omission was treated as an error requiring correction, as the connected appeal had been disposed of commonly without determining whether the penalty was upheld or set aside. The rectification application was therefore allowed to that extent, and the appeal was restored for fresh disposal on the penalty issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358834