https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358829 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit on input services and upholding the refund claim under Rule 5 of CCR. The decision was based on the legality of the exports under bond and the overriding effect of Rule 6(6) of the CCR. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and emphasizing the absence of impropriety in the impugned order. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:54:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358829 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit on input services and upholding the refund claim under Rule 5 of CCR. The decision was based on the legality of the exports under bond and the overriding effect of Rule 6(6) of the CCR. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and emphasizing the absence of impropriety in the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358829