https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12724 A writ petition seeking relief under section 89(1) of the Income-tax Act was held not maintainable because the claim depended on factual verification of particulars and proof. The statutory scheme required the assessee to place the necessary details before the Assessing Officer, who would then examine whether the relief was admissible. As the issue involved factual adjudication within the statutory mechanism, writ jurisdiction was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioners were left to pursue the prescribed remedy before the Assessing Officer. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2009 15:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12724 A writ petition seeking relief under section 89(1) of the Income-tax Act was held not maintainable because the claim depended on factual verification of particulars and proof. The statutory scheme required the assessee to place the necessary details before the Assessing Officer, who would then examine whether the relief was admissible. As the issue involved factual adjudication within the statutory mechanism, writ jurisdiction was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioners were left to pursue the prescribed remedy before the Assessing Officer. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12724