<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Filing FIR and Section 138 Proceedings Don&#039;t Stop Plaintiffs from Seeking Civil Remedies for Outstanding Dues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38966</link>
    <description>Recovery of outstanding dues - Filing of the FIR and even of the proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act did not debar the plaintiffs to avail the civil remedy to recover the outstanding amount. The defendant’s arrest pursuant to the cancellation of bail did not absolve him of the liability to pay the outstanding dues. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:09:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Filing FIR and Section 138 Proceedings Don&#039;t Stop Plaintiffs from Seeking Civil Remedies for Outstanding Dues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38966</link>
      <description>Recovery of outstanding dues - Filing of the FIR and even of the proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act did not debar the plaintiffs to avail the civil remedy to recover the outstanding amount. The defendant’s arrest pursuant to the cancellation of bail did not absolve him of the liability to pay the outstanding dues. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:09:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>