<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Contract Execution: Appellant&#039;s Claim Not an Operational Debt Under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38965</link>
    <description>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - there is a plausible dispute between the parties in regard to execution of contract involving supply of material as well as rendering of works at the site - The claim set up by the Appellant does not fall within the definition of operational debt - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:06:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Contract Execution: Appellant&#039;s Claim Not an Operational Debt Under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38965</link>
      <description>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - there is a plausible dispute between the parties in regard to execution of contract involving supply of material as well as rendering of works at the site - The claim set up by the Appellant does not fall within the definition of operational debt - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:06:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>