<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358824</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the ITAT erred in including Modicare Limited as a comparable despite significant functional differences. The Court directed a re-examination of the inclusion of Modicare Limited, feasibility of adjustments for trading comparables, and appropriateness of the TNMM over the RPM. The appeal was allowed, and the parties were instructed to appear before the ITAT for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358824</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the ITAT erred in including Modicare Limited as a comparable despite significant functional differences. The Court directed a re-examination of the inclusion of Modicare Limited, feasibility of adjustments for trading comparables, and appropriateness of the TNMM over the RPM. The appeal was allowed, and the parties were instructed to appear before the ITAT for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>