<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 928 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358817</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The cost of production of TV serials and programs was treated as revenue expenditure, following precedents and legal interpretations. Depreciation on the Film Software Library was allowed at 25%, treating it as an intangible asset, consistent with previous rulings. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 928 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358817</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The cost of production of TV serials and programs was treated as revenue expenditure, following precedents and legal interpretations. Depreciation on the Film Software Library was allowed at 25%, treating it as an intangible asset, consistent with previous rulings. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>