<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 919 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358808</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order, declaring it irrational and unsustainable. Respondent no.2 was ordered to pay costs to appellant no.1, and the company appeal and pending applications were disposed of. The court emphasized the importance of accurate representation of facts and thorough examination in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 919 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358808</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order, declaring it irrational and unsustainable. Respondent no.2 was ordered to pay costs to appellant no.1, and the company appeal and pending applications were disposed of. The court emphasized the importance of accurate representation of facts and thorough examination in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>