https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358806 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the appellate tribunal. It held that the appellants violated Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, by failing to notify the proposed combination in a timely manner. The imposition of a penalty under Section 43A was deemed warranted, emphasizing that the breach of a civil obligation does not require proof of mens rea. The penalty was upheld as the contravention was established, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:35:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358806 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the appellate tribunal. It held that the appellants violated Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, by failing to notify the proposed combination in a timely manner. The imposition of a penalty under Section 43A was deemed warranted, emphasizing that the breach of a civil obligation does not require proof of mens rea. The penalty was upheld as the contravention was established, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358806