https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358795 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services under Service Tax. The dispute revolved around whether the services provided should be categorized as "Works Contract Service" or "Erection, Commissioning or Installation of Plant and Machinery and Equipment Service." After considering the activities undertaken by the appellant and a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal determined that the services fell under the "Works Contract Service" category. Consequently, the Service Tax demand under the alternative category was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358795 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services under Service Tax. The dispute revolved around whether the services provided should be categorized as "Works Contract Service" or "Erection, Commissioning or Installation of Plant and Machinery and Equipment Service." After considering the activities undertaken by the appellant and a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal determined that the services fell under the "Works Contract Service" category. Consequently, the Service Tax demand under the alternative category was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358795