<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 904 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting Cenvat credit to the appellant. The decision was based on consistent facts with previous cases where credit was allowed, emphasizing the authorities&#039; burden to prove non-compliance. Concrete evidence was deemed necessary to deny credit, and adherence to legal precedents in similar cases was underscored. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 904 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting Cenvat credit to the appellant. The decision was based on consistent facts with previous cases where credit was allowed, emphasizing the authorities&#039; burden to prove non-compliance. Concrete evidence was deemed necessary to deny credit, and adherence to legal precedents in similar cases was underscored. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>