<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 901 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358790</link>
    <description>The case involved an alleged violation of transaction value principles under the Central Excise Act, where the Respondents cleared goods at a lower rate, leading to a demand by the department. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal, citing the demand as time-barred and revenue neutral. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing revenue neutrality and aligning with previous tribunal decisions. The judgment upheld the dismissal based on revenue neutrality and the time-barred nature of the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 901 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358790</link>
      <description>The case involved an alleged violation of transaction value principles under the Central Excise Act, where the Respondents cleared goods at a lower rate, leading to a demand by the department. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal, citing the demand as time-barred and revenue neutral. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing revenue neutrality and aligning with previous tribunal decisions. The judgment upheld the dismissal based on revenue neutrality and the time-barred nature of the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>