<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 899 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demands and the impugned order. The Tribunal found the show cause notice issued during provisional assessment to be illegal and unsustainable. It also deemed the discounts claimed by the Appellant to be permissible, based on a predetermined discount structure. The decision was supported by relevant legal precedents, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential reliefs for the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 899 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demands and the impugned order. The Tribunal found the show cause notice issued during provisional assessment to be illegal and unsustainable. It also deemed the discounts claimed by the Appellant to be permissible, based on a predetermined discount structure. The decision was supported by relevant legal precedents, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential reliefs for the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>