https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358784 The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation related to alleged clandestine removal and stock of raw material, reducing and ultimately nullifying the demands due to lack of evidence and reliance on assumptions. The tribunal also overturned the redemption fine on confiscated raw material, emphasizing the absence of provisions for such confiscation. Both appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants based on the insufficiency of evidence supporting the allegations and demands made against them. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358784 The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation related to alleged clandestine removal and stock of raw material, reducing and ultimately nullifying the demands due to lack of evidence and reliance on assumptions. The tribunal also overturned the redemption fine on confiscated raw material, emphasizing the absence of provisions for such confiscation. Both appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants based on the insufficiency of evidence supporting the allegations and demands made against them. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358784