https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358782 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that the appellant was not liable to reverse Cenvat credit on the value of electricity supplied to the guest house and residential colony as bagasse was not excisable. Additionally, Cenvat credit was deemed inadmissible on common input/services used in bagasse production. The show cause notice under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules was found not maintainable, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:34:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358782 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that the appellant was not liable to reverse Cenvat credit on the value of electricity supplied to the guest house and residential colony as bagasse was not excisable. Additionally, Cenvat credit was deemed inadmissible on common input/services used in bagasse production. The show cause notice under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules was found not maintainable, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358782