https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358778 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's rejection of the remission claim for Central Excise duty under Rule 21. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's reasons for rejection to be unsubstantiated and lacking valid justification, especially in disregarding the State Excise Authority's acceptance of the loss. Emphasizing the importance of proper consideration of evidence, the Tribunal granted consequential benefits to the appellant, highlighting the necessity for well-supported and reasoned administrative decisions in excise duty cases. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358778 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's rejection of the remission claim for Central Excise duty under Rule 21. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's reasons for rejection to be unsubstantiated and lacking valid justification, especially in disregarding the State Excise Authority's acceptance of the loss. Emphasizing the importance of proper consideration of evidence, the Tribunal granted consequential benefits to the appellant, highlighting the necessity for well-supported and reasoned administrative decisions in excise duty cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358778