<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 886 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358775</link>
    <description>Inter-State transit consignments were examined under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax and corresponding Central Goods and Services Tax framework rather than the U.P. Goods and Services Tax regime. The Court treated the seizure as prima facie governed by the inter-State tax provisions because the goods were moving from outside the State, and Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act attracts Central Goods and Services Tax procedures for inspection, search and seizure. It further noted that the Central e-way bill system became effective only later, so the absence of an operative e-way bill requirement on the relevant date rendered the detention prima facie unsustainable and justified release of the goods and vehicle on indemnity and security.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 886 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358775</link>
      <description>Inter-State transit consignments were examined under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax and corresponding Central Goods and Services Tax framework rather than the U.P. Goods and Services Tax regime. The Court treated the seizure as prima facie governed by the inter-State tax provisions because the goods were moving from outside the State, and Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act attracts Central Goods and Services Tax procedures for inspection, search and seizure. It further noted that the Central e-way bill system became effective only later, so the absence of an operative e-way bill requirement on the relevant date rendered the detention prima facie unsustainable and justified release of the goods and vehicle on indemnity and security.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>