<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 857 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358746</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, set aside the CESTAT order, and remanded the matter for reassessment within a specified timeframe. The Court held that the department cannot collect an amount exceeding 20% of the FOB value for freight charges, regardless of whether a protest was made or not. The appeal was deemed maintainable even though duty was not paid under protest, as excess payment was found to violate statutory rules. The Court favored the appellant on substantial questions of law and directed reassessment in accordance with statutory rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 857 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358746</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, set aside the CESTAT order, and remanded the matter for reassessment within a specified timeframe. The Court held that the department cannot collect an amount exceeding 20% of the FOB value for freight charges, regardless of whether a protest was made or not. The appeal was deemed maintainable even though duty was not paid under protest, as excess payment was found to violate statutory rules. The Court favored the appellant on substantial questions of law and directed reassessment in accordance with statutory rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>