<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 856 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding electronic evidence inadmissible due to non-compliance with Section 138C of the Customs Act, 1962. Failure to examine witnesses as per Section 138B weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. Appeals were allowed, and demands against the appellants were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 856 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding electronic evidence inadmissible due to non-compliance with Section 138C of the Customs Act, 1962. Failure to examine witnesses as per Section 138B weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. Appeals were allowed, and demands against the appellants were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>