<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 852 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Director of M/s. Andslite Pvt. Ltd. under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the duty demand against the company had been previously set aside. The Tribunal found no justification for upholding the penalty in the absence of a duty demand confirmation. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, the Director of M/s. Andslite Pvt. Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 852 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Director of M/s. Andslite Pvt. Ltd. under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the duty demand against the company had been previously set aside. The Tribunal found no justification for upholding the penalty in the absence of a duty demand confirmation. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, the Director of M/s. Andslite Pvt. Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>