<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a thorough reconsideration by the Appellate Authority in light of the various Tribunal decisions cited by both parties. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the specific circumstances and relevant legal precedents in determining the admissibility of Cenvat credit in cases involving the transportation of vehicles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a thorough reconsideration by the Appellate Authority in light of the various Tribunal decisions cited by both parties. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the specific circumstances and relevant legal precedents in determining the admissibility of Cenvat credit in cases involving the transportation of vehicles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>