https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358734 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the contract should be classified under works contract service. No Service Tax liability could be imposed before 01.06.2007 due to the composite nature of the contract and the exclusion of railway projects from works contract service taxation. The decision was supported by legal precedent from previous Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:24:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358734 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the contract should be classified under works contract service. No Service Tax liability could be imposed before 01.06.2007 due to the composite nature of the contract and the exclusion of railway projects from works contract service taxation. The decision was supported by legal precedent from previous Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358734