<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 839 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Government Co-operative Society, in a case concerning the liability for service tax on the transport of food grains under GTA service. The appellant&#039;s contention that the absence of consignment notes or equivalent documents negated the tax liability under GTA service was upheld. The Tribunal found that the continuous transport arrangements with individual truck owners did not meet the requirements for tax liability under GTA service on a reverse charge basis. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed due to the lack of essential elements for tax liability under GTA service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 839 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Government Co-operative Society, in a case concerning the liability for service tax on the transport of food grains under GTA service. The appellant&#039;s contention that the absence of consignment notes or equivalent documents negated the tax liability under GTA service was upheld. The Tribunal found that the continuous transport arrangements with individual truck owners did not meet the requirements for tax liability under GTA service on a reverse charge basis. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed due to the lack of essential elements for tax liability under GTA service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>