<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the Service Tax liability imposed on the appellant for providing computer education and training program in graphic animations and cinematics was not justified. The decision was based on the fact that the main company had already paid Service Tax on the consideration received from students, and the appellant acted as an instrument in carrying out the training program managed by the main company. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant did not receive any consideration directly from students and that a similar case had been decided in favor of the business partner of the main company in a previous Commissioner&#039;s order. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability against the appellant and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the Service Tax liability imposed on the appellant for providing computer education and training program in graphic animations and cinematics was not justified. The decision was based on the fact that the main company had already paid Service Tax on the consideration received from students, and the appellant acted as an instrument in carrying out the training program managed by the main company. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant did not receive any consideration directly from students and that a similar case had been decided in favor of the business partner of the main company in a previous Commissioner&#039;s order. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability against the appellant and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>