<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 817 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358706</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order. The denial of credit for services related to fly ash removal and disposal was found unsustainable as it was crucial for the manufacturing process. The penalty imposed based on the dispute over supplementary invoices was also deemed unjustified. Therefore, the appeal was allowed on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 817 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358706</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order. The denial of credit for services related to fly ash removal and disposal was found unsustainable as it was crucial for the manufacturing process. The penalty imposed based on the dispute over supplementary invoices was also deemed unjustified. Therefore, the appeal was allowed on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>