https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358705 Denial of cross-examination without recording the reasons required under section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, together with failure to supply the relied-upon documents, was treated as a breach of natural justice that disabled an effective defence. The impugned adjudication was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the original authority for fresh decision after compliance with section 9D and supply of the documents, with due opportunity to the appellants. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:23:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358705 Denial of cross-examination without recording the reasons required under section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, together with failure to supply the relied-upon documents, was treated as a breach of natural justice that disabled an effective defence. The impugned adjudication was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the original authority for fresh decision after compliance with section 9D and supply of the documents, with due opportunity to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358705