<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 813 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358702</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an entertainment tax demand raised a jurisdictional objection to tax on ticket receipts from T-20 cricket matches. The petitioner had already paid service tax on the ticket receipts and a substantial part of the entertainment tax demand, and the same controversy was pending before the Supreme Court and other courts. In view of the substantial dispute and pending parallel proceedings, the High Court stayed operation of the impugned demand order and granted interim protection against coercive recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:23:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 813 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358702</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an entertainment tax demand raised a jurisdictional objection to tax on ticket receipts from T-20 cricket matches. The petitioner had already paid service tax on the ticket receipts and a substantial part of the entertainment tax demand, and the same controversy was pending before the Supreme Court and other courts. In view of the substantial dispute and pending parallel proceedings, the High Court stayed operation of the impugned demand order and granted interim protection against coercive recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>