<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 66 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12703</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the petitioners&#039; accounting method had been accepted by the Revenue for subsequent years, and excise duty and customs duty were paid before the due date. The court referenced the Hindustan Lever Ltd. case and ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the notice dated January 31, 2001.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 66 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12703</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the petitioners&#039; accounting method had been accepted by the Revenue for subsequent years, and excise duty and customs duty were paid before the due date. The court referenced the Hindustan Lever Ltd. case and ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the notice dated January 31, 2001.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>