<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 811 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358700</link>
    <description>The Advance Ruling classified skin care products, with only Rupam (Pimple Pack) and Pailab (Anti-Crack Cream) deemed as Ayurvedic Medicaments under heading 3004. Other products were classified under heading 3304 as they were not primarily intended as medicaments. Swarnajyoti, Sunayana, and Tarumitra-60 were not yet manufactured, hence no ruling was made on their classification. The ruling remains valid unless voided under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 811 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358700</link>
      <description>The Advance Ruling classified skin care products, with only Rupam (Pimple Pack) and Pailab (Anti-Crack Cream) deemed as Ayurvedic Medicaments under heading 3004. Other products were classified under heading 3304 as they were not primarily intended as medicaments. Swarnajyoti, Sunayana, and Tarumitra-60 were not yet manufactured, hence no ruling was made on their classification. The ruling remains valid unless voided under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>