<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 805 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358694</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and granting a stay of recovery for the remaining outstanding demand for the assessment years in question until the appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal were disposed of. The Court clarified that its observations were for the purpose of showing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the interim order and should not influence the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:24:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 805 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358694</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and granting a stay of recovery for the remaining outstanding demand for the assessment years in question until the appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal were disposed of. The Court clarified that its observations were for the purpose of showing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the interim order and should not influence the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>