<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358687</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) in both issues based on the lack of evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars and the absence of independent inquiry by the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358687</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) in both issues based on the lack of evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars and the absence of independent inquiry by the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>