<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 784 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358673</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, a government-owned bank, in a case involving duty-free import of gold bars for jewelry manufacturing. The appellant was absolved of duty liability as the gold was used for its intended purpose, cleared to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) against foreign exchange remittance by the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) jewelry maker, and approved by the Development Commissioner as deemed export. The Tribunal held that the appellant fulfilled import conditions and disposed of the gold with proper authorization, thus overturning the Customs duty demand and penalties imposed. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was not held liable for duty foregone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 784 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358673</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, a government-owned bank, in a case involving duty-free import of gold bars for jewelry manufacturing. The appellant was absolved of duty liability as the gold was used for its intended purpose, cleared to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) against foreign exchange remittance by the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) jewelry maker, and approved by the Development Commissioner as deemed export. The Tribunal held that the appellant fulfilled import conditions and disposed of the gold with proper authorization, thus overturning the Customs duty demand and penalties imposed. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was not held liable for duty foregone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>