https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358670 The contract was held to contain a valid arbitration agreement because the incorporated letter of indent and contract documents provided for mutual discussion, conciliation, and then reference of disputes to an independent arbitrator, with Delhi as the seat and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applicable. Once that agreement was established, the Section 11 inquiry was limited to appointment, and because the parties had not constituted the tribunal by mutual agreement, judicial appointment was warranted. A sole arbitrator was therefore appointed, subject to the statutory disclosure and eligibility requirements governing arbitrators. en-us Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:19:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358670 The contract was held to contain a valid arbitration agreement because the incorporated letter of indent and contract documents provided for mutual discussion, conciliation, and then reference of disputes to an independent arbitrator, with Delhi as the seat and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applicable. Once that agreement was established, the Section 11 inquiry was limited to appointment, and because the parties had not constituted the tribunal by mutual agreement, judicial appointment was warranted. A sole arbitrator was therefore appointed, subject to the statutory disclosure and eligibility requirements governing arbitrators. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358670