<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 779 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358668</link>
    <description>The court entertained the petition due to violations of natural justice, lack of opportunity for the petitioner to address the authority, and undue urgency in proceedings. The petitioner was directed to deposit an additional sum and engage a representative for future proceedings to ensure fairness in addressing service tax collection issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 779 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358668</link>
      <description>The court entertained the petition due to violations of natural justice, lack of opportunity for the petitioner to address the authority, and undue urgency in proceedings. The petitioner was directed to deposit an additional sum and engage a representative for future proceedings to ensure fairness in addressing service tax collection issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>