<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 776 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the demand for Business Auxiliary Service tax and setting aside the demand for Technical Testing and Analysis Service until 31.3.2011. However, the demand for Technical Testing and Analysis Service from 1.4.2011 onwards was upheld. The penalties under Section 77 &amp;amp; 78 were set aside by invoking Section 80 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 776 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the demand for Business Auxiliary Service tax and setting aside the demand for Technical Testing and Analysis Service until 31.3.2011. However, the demand for Technical Testing and Analysis Service from 1.4.2011 onwards was upheld. The penalties under Section 77 &amp;amp; 78 were set aside by invoking Section 80 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>