<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 773 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the respondent-assessee. The Show Cause Notice lacked findings on the transfer of effective control of goods, essential for determining liability under the category of &quot;Supply of Tangible Goods.&quot; As the respondent demonstrated no transfer of possession or effective control to customers, the Tribunal deemed the Notice vague and not maintainable, granting consequential benefits to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 773 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the respondent-assessee. The Show Cause Notice lacked findings on the transfer of effective control of goods, essential for determining liability under the category of &quot;Supply of Tangible Goods.&quot; As the respondent demonstrated no transfer of possession or effective control to customers, the Tribunal deemed the Notice vague and not maintainable, granting consequential benefits to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>