<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 755 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. Fly ash generated during the manufacturing of sponge iron was deemed not subject to tax liability, following legal precedents. Additionally, the appellant was allowed to avail credit on rejected finished goods returned by suppliers, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s contention. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to legal precedents and correctly applying relevant rules in determining tax liabilities and credit availment in excise cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 755 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. Fly ash generated during the manufacturing of sponge iron was deemed not subject to tax liability, following legal precedents. Additionally, the appellant was allowed to avail credit on rejected finished goods returned by suppliers, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s contention. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to legal precedents and correctly applying relevant rules in determining tax liabilities and credit availment in excise cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>