https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200712 A Badli worker engaged day to day under a scheme reserving no vested right to continued employment could not claim retrenchment protection merely from inclusion in a select or wait list. The Court held that such a worker did not acquire an indefeasible right to appointment or continuation in service, and discontinuance for unsuitability was therefore valid on the facts. It further held that termination based on unsatisfactory service did not require a fresh hearing where prior misconduct had already been separately dealt with in proceedings that had attained finality, making any further opportunity an empty formality. The employer's discontinuance of the workers was upheld. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2024 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200712 A Badli worker engaged day to day under a scheme reserving no vested right to continued employment could not claim retrenchment protection merely from inclusion in a select or wait list. The Court held that such a worker did not acquire an indefeasible right to appointment or continuation in service, and discontinuance for unsuitability was therefore valid on the facts. It further held that termination based on unsatisfactory service did not require a fresh hearing where prior misconduct had already been separately dealt with in proceedings that had attained finality, making any further opportunity an empty formality. The employer's discontinuance of the workers was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200712