<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 743 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer to be defective as it did not specify the exact charge under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal held that such ambiguous notices are invalid, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed on the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty and emphasizing that the other grounds raised by the assessee were rendered moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 743 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer to be defective as it did not specify the exact charge under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal held that such ambiguous notices are invalid, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed on the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty and emphasizing that the other grounds raised by the assessee were rendered moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>