<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 741 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and proper examination before invoking Section 41(1) for discrepancies in sundry creditors&#039; balances. The decision was based on legal precedents and concluded that there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability by the creditor, warranting the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 741 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and proper examination before invoking Section 41(1) for discrepancies in sundry creditors&#039; balances. The decision was based on legal precedents and concluded that there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability by the creditor, warranting the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>