<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 726 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a Customs House Agent regarding the taxability of incentives received from ICD operators and steamer owners. It held that mere receipt of incentives was not sufficient to establish a promotional relationship, and lack of factual verification rendered the tax liability decision untenable. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the tax liability on income from brokerage of transport and allied activities, as well as on certain reimbursable expenditures, due to a lack of evidence and detailed examination by the authorities. The decision highlighted the importance of factual verification in determining tax liabilities and ruled in favor of the CHA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 726 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a Customs House Agent regarding the taxability of incentives received from ICD operators and steamer owners. It held that mere receipt of incentives was not sufficient to establish a promotional relationship, and lack of factual verification rendered the tax liability decision untenable. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the tax liability on income from brokerage of transport and allied activities, as well as on certain reimbursable expenditures, due to a lack of evidence and detailed examination by the authorities. The decision highlighted the importance of factual verification in determining tax liabilities and ruled in favor of the CHA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>